TribLIVE

| News

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Allegheny County passes 2013 budget, offsetting increase in property values

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By Bobby Kerlik
Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2012, 7:52 p.m.
 

Allegheny County Council on Tuesday passed a $799.4 million budget for 2013 that lowers the tax rate to 4.73 mills, offsetting the rise in property values because of the court-ordered reassessment.

The budget, which passed 13-1, closely mirrors the one that Executive Rich Fitzgerald presented to council last month. Fitzgerald said in a prepared statement that he is glad the budget passed and “that we are able to move into 2013 with no tax increase and a lower millage rate and that we did so without using one-time revenues to balance our budget.”

The budget includes a $447,000 cut to Controller Chelsa Wagner's office — the only row office that lost funding. Council restored $200,000 in funding to the controller from Fitzgerald's proposed $647,000 cut but defeated a proposal from Councilwoman Heather Heidelbaugh, R-Mt. Lebanon, to restore more funding. Heidelbaugh voted against the budget.

Wagner and Fitzgerald have clashed on several issues. She said the cuts will force layoffs in her office, while Fitzgerald said his cuts do not affect personnel.

“It's about me not being a good little girl. This is the oldest style of politics there is,” Wagner said.

The 17 percent millage decrease means that a person whose home is assessed at $100,000 would pay $473 under the lower millage rate, instead of $569. Under state law, taxing bodies cannot reap more than 5 percent more in revenue as a result of reassessments and must adjust tax rates accordingly.

Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or bkerlik@tribweb.com.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read News