Budget crisis prompts state Department of Education to prepare shutdown checklist for school districts
The state Department of Education has developed a checklist for school districts in case they are forced to shut down because of a funding shortage.
The memo, dated Tuesday, arrived as the state approaches its ninth month without a complete budget for 2015-16.
All school districts rely heavily on funds from the state, and the budget impasse has forced some to take out loans.
The Education Department drafted the checklist in response to questions from school districts about what steps they would need to take if they were forced to close.
“This is not to suggest that any school district closures are imminent,” said Jeffrey Sheridan, spokesman for Gov. Tom Wolf.
According to the memo, “closure of a school district for lack of funds is an unprecedented event that has not been contemplated in the Public School Code.”
The checklist suggests that districts develop a plan to ensure the needs of special education students are met. It advises district officials to review their collective bargaining agreements and outline a plan for debt payments.
Shutting down a district would take about 60 days, according to the memo.
Wolf this month outlined a proposed $32.7 billion state budget for 2016-17. The budget plan would expand sales taxes to boost education spending and close a $2 billion deficit in 2017.
Wolf has said that without a balanced budget next year, the impact on education would be disastrous, because the looming deficit would result in substantial cuts to school funding.
Tony Raap is a Tribune-Review staff writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.