Price of Fayette County home from 'Silence of the Lambs' keeps falling
Potential buyers have been silent so far when it comes to offers for the Fayette County house featured as the villain's torture den in the thriller “The Silence of the Lambs.”
But spring is nearly here, and Dianne Wilks hopes that brings a real offer.
“It's going to sell,” said the real estate agent with RE/MAX Select Realty. “It's a lovely home.”
Owners Scott and Barbara Lloyd this month further reduced their asking price, which now is $224,900. They've reduced it four times since it hit the market in August at $300,000.
“That was the pie-in-the-sky price,” Wilks said. “We were hoping some movie person would come in and buy it.”
An open house is scheduled April 3. Wilks said she has shown the house a number of times recently and has private showings scheduled for potential buyers from Virginia and Indiana.
“I know they are going to like it,” she said.
Several previous offers fell through for various reasons, Wilks said. All were from local residents.
“I feel that more than likely that will be the buyer — someone nearby,” she said. “You don't just move from New York City to Layton.”
The small hamlet sits across the Youghiogheny River from Perryopolis, about an hour south of Pittsburgh.
The three-story Victorian on Circle Street was featured in the 1991 murder thriller — and multiple Oscar winner, including Best Picture — as the home of serial killer Jame “Buffalo Bill” Gumb. There's no prisoner holding pit in the basement, as the movie's house had.
The house was the second-most viewed property in 2015 on realtor.com, trailing only a 28,000-square-foot Beverly Hills mansion originally listed at $195 million. The owner pulled it off the market after a $46 million price reduction failed to attract a buyer.
Wilks said she is confident the Lloyds' home will sell this year.
“It's like we're close but no cigar,” she said.
The house has four bedrooms and a finished attic, but limited indoor plumbing served by a well and only one bathroom.
“That has been a problem,” Wilks said.
Part of the price reduction was to account for money needed to add a second bath or powder room, Wilks said. One could be added under the main staircase or by sacrificing the back staircase, or part of the butler's pantry or dining room, she said.
It also has central air, a modern kitchen and a gas-log fireplace in the “winter parlor.” A vintage Chessie System train caboose stands next to an in-ground pool.
The house was built in 1910. The Lloyds bought it in 1976.
“They've done a great job taking care of it,” Wilks said. “The house itself is immaculate, beautiful.”
Jason Cato is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7936 or email@example.com.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.