Share This Page

Pittsburgh woman injured by PNC Park foul ball sues Pirates, MLB

| Friday, March 11, 2016, 3:51 p.m.

A Shadyside woman is suing Major League Baseball, the Pirates and the Sports & Exhibition Authority because a foul ball smacked her in the back of her head as she was taking her seat behind home plate last year.

Wendy Camlin and her attorney, Mark Gordon, filed the civil lawsuit Friday. In it, they identify Camlin as the fan struck by a foul ball off the bat of Chicago Cubs player Starlin Castro in the second inning April 20.

Camlin received medical attention during a 23-minute delay in the game before being removed on a stretcher and taken to UPMC Presbyterian in Oakland by ambulance. She was treated and released by the next day, authorities said.

“(Chris Coghlan, who was in the on-deck circle) said he thought the ball hit the wall. That's how loud it was,” Cubs manager Joe Maddon said in the post-game news conference. “And the umpires said the same thing. It was that definitive of a hard, packing sound. ... The couple guys that did see it said it was pretty horrid.”

The lawsuit says Camlin suffered a concussion, traumatic brain injury, migraines, neck pain, tinnitus, anxiety and other symptoms as a result of the foul ball, which she said hit her in the back of the head because she was facing away from play and following an usher's instructions as she took her seat in Section 16, Row A.

“Due to the ongoing litigation, it would be inappropriate to comment at this time,” said Pirates spokesman Brian Warecki.

Representatives of MLB and the SEA did not return requests for comment.

The “lightweight, flexible” netting behind home plate, the suit said, was either improperly installed or inadequate to prevent the ball from traveling far enough into the aisle to hit Camlin as she shimmied past other fans in the front row.

In addition, the ushers should not have directed her to her seat during play when she was at risk, the lawsuit said.

The league responded to several fan injuries such as Camlin's by issuing recommendations in December that all clubs should extend the netting up to 70 feet from home plate to protect fans from flying fouls or lost bats. But the recommendations didn't mention strengthening or replacing the netting behind home plate.

A 2013 Pennsylvania Superior Court decision upheld the so-called “baseball rule” in the state, which limits sports leagues' liability for injuries to their fans if they have taken reasonable precautions to screen the most dangerous areas.

The fine print on the back of Pirates tickets includes warnings that the holder assumes the risk of being “injured by thrown or broken bats, thrown or batted balls and objects thrown into the stands for entertainment purposes,” and agrees that the league and team are not responsible for such injuries.

Camlin is seeking damages in excess of $35,000 from each of the defendants.

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-391-0927 or msantoni@tribweb.com.

Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Emergency workers aid Wendy Camlin of Shadyside, who was struck by a foul ball behind home plate during the second inning of the Pirates game against the Cubs on April 20, 2015, at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Trib Total Media
The Cubs' Starlin Castro watches as emergency workers aid Wendy Camlin of Shadyside, who was struck by a foul ball he hit behind home plate during the second inning against the Pirates on Monday, April 20, 2015, at PNC Park.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.