State House committee passes bill to toughen DUI penalty
The state House Transportation Committee approved a bill Monday that would require convicted first-time drunken drivers to purchase an ignition interlock as part of their sentence.
The proposal, Senate Bill 290, previously passed the full Senate with unanimous bipartisan agreement.
The measure will go to the full House of Representatives for consideration.
State crime data show there were 46,210 DUI arrests in Pennsylvania in 2015, including 3,284 in Allegheny County. The data did not indicate how many of those were first-time offenders.
Before passing the proposal, the House committee added language allowing police officers to charge drivers from other states if they are not driving with an ignition interlock and are supposed to have one, among other technical changes.
If the House passes the bill, it will require a concurrent vote from the Senate before Gov. Tom Wolf could sign it into law.
The bill would require the DUI defendant, if found guilty, to pay for installation of the ignition interlock device and lease it for a year. The device, under current law, is only required for second and subsequent offenses.
It costs about $1,200 to lease for a year, according to PennDOT. Hardship exemptions are available in some cases.
Drivers are also issued a special license that says they require an ignition interlock.
A news conference is scheduled Tuesday by citizen activists of PA Parents Against Impaired Driving, who are pushing for the bill's final passage.
Melissa Daniels is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8511 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.