ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh's 103-year-old Kaufmann's clock ticking once again

Bob Bauder
| Wednesday, March 30, 2016, 4:24 p.m.
The Kaufmann's clock once again is marking time Downtown.
staff photographer
The Kaufmann's clock once again is marking time Downtown.

Helen Reaggle was late Wednesday for a meeting with her sister under the landmark Kaufmann's clock.

She could tell because the 103-year-old clock Downtown is once again marking time.

“I'm here, but I don't know where she is,” said Reaggle, 60, of Trafford.

Core Realty of Philadelphia, which owns the former Kaufmann's Department Store building, switched off power to the clock because of an electrical problem, Pittsburgh Councilman Corey O'Connor said. The Tribune-Review reported Wednesday that the clock had stopped.

Core called O'Connor about noon Wednesday to say that the clock again was ticking.

“It's a good company to work with when you can make one phone call and the problem's fixed,” O'Connor said.

This week, an executive at Huntington Bank tipped off O'Connor about the clock and offered financial assistance to get it running.

The clock at Smithfield Street and Fifth Avenue has been a meeting place for generations of Pittsburghers, including Reaggle.

“This clock is famous,” she said. “My aunt lived in Mt. Washington when I was young, and she'd meet me under this clock and take me up in the incline to her house.”

Macy's, which owned the former Kaufmann's building, closed and sold the building last year to Core for $15 million. Core plans to convert it into a hotel, condominiums and stores.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.