ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh pension funds will get $18M in gambling tax revenue

| Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2016, 5:57 p.m.

A long-running feud between Pittsburgh and a state financial oversight authority ended Tuesday.

The Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority's board of directors voted 3-1 to approve an agreement that earmarks $18 million in withheld gambling tax revenue for Pittsburgh's pension obligations.

Members approved the deal with the city during a special board meeting at the City-County Building, Downtown. Authority Treasurer Michael Danovitz cast the lone dissenting vote. He said the proposal didn't do enough to address the city's pension debt. Board member Nicholas Varischetti did not attend the meeting.

The ICA withheld gambling tax revenue from the city in 2014 and 2015 in an effort to force officials to implement a new financial accounting system. Pittsburgh filed a lawsuit against the ICA in July 2015 seeking the release of the funds.

The agreement reached Tuesday requires the city to dismiss the litigation.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.