ShareThis Page

Ex-firefighter accused of stealing hall rental payments

| Monday, July 17, 2017, 10:07 a.m.
Jeffrey S. Tickerhoof

A former member of the Harrison City Fire Department is accused of taking $3,500 in payments for use of the banquet hall and depositing them into his bank account, according to court papers.

Jeffrey S. Tickerhoof, 47, of Penn Township is scheduled for a preliminary hearing July 25 on charges that he took for his personal use five checks over a seven-month period from four people who thought they were booking the Harrison Room. He was arraigned Sunday.

Township police were tipped off after a person who paid a $500 deposit to rent the hall for a January event learned that the department had no records of the booking or a corresponding deposit in its bank account, according to a criminal complaint.

An investigation revealed that Tickerhoof, who was a booking agent at the time, signed the check.

Police examined the last four bookings between June 2015 and January 2016 for which the department didn't receive any payment and found similar situations. Investigators matched the signature on Tickerhoof's drivers license to the one on the checks, according to the complaint.

Department president Joe Gibbons said Tickerhoof has not been involved with the department for about a year and a half. He declined to comment further on the case.

Tickerhoof is charged with five counts each of theft, receiving stolen property and misapplication of entrusted property. He is free on $50,000 unsecured bond in the case but was being held in the Westmoreland County Prison on an unrelated bench warrant.

He did not have an attorney listed in online court records.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.