ShareThis Page

Allegheny County tests show Beechtree Commons' water system free of Legionella bacteria

Michael DiVittorio
| Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017, 1:17 p.m.
Allegheny County Health Department found a resident at Beechtree Commons in Penn Hills had a Legionella infection Nov. 2.
Michael DiVittorio | Tribune-Review
Allegheny County Health Department found a resident at Beechtree Commons in Penn Hills had a Legionella infection Nov. 2.

The water system of a Penn Hills senior housing complex where a resident was recently diagnosed with Legionnaires' disease does not contain Legionella bacteria, according to test results released last week by the Allegheny County Health Department.

“It is still unknown where a resident acquired the infection, as the individual had been at other locations during the exposure period,” public health information officer Ryan Scarpino said. “The water is clean, and there are no more cases there.”

National Church Residences, which operates the two-building complex with 100 residents at 6460 Leechburg Road, was notified of a resident having Legionnaires' disease on Nov. 2.

Legionnaires' disease is a severe form of pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria in water. The disease is not easily transmitted from person to person; most people get it from inhaling mist containing the bacteria, according to the state Health Department. Older adults, smokers and people with weakened immune systems are particularly susceptible to the disease.

Beechtree has been providing bottled water to residents since the case was discovered.

“We are very pleased with the Health Department and the work that they've done with us, and the staff as well,” said Karen Twinem, National Church's vice president of communications. “We hope they can find where the source is.”

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367 or mdivittorio@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.