Penn State legal costs in Sandusky case $16.7 million and climbing
Penn State's legal costs in the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse case continue to escalate — and more are coming.
The school's costs for legal counsel and consultants related to the Sandusky scandal were $16.7 million as of June 30, university officials announced Tuesday.
Costs included $9.97 million for the university's internal investigation by former FBI Director Louis Freeh's firm and crisis communications firms; $3.94 million in university legal fees; $56,182 for external investigations; $1.6 million for legal costs for university officers including athletic director Tim Curley, retired Vice President Gary Schultz and former President Graham Spanier; and $1.17 million for “other institutional expenses.”
Sandusky, 68, a retired Nittany Lions football defensive coordinator, is awaiting sentencing on his conviction in June for sexually abusing 10 boys over 15 years, often in university facilities.
The university's most recent cost report does not include settlements for victims or the $60 million fine the NCAA levied against the university in July.
Several of Sandusky's victims have filed lawsuits against Penn State or served notice that they intend to seek damages and others are expected to follow.
“The actual legal costs are the least of (Penn state's) concerns; it's the settling of the cases that's the big issue. ... Pennsylvania juries have been awarding damages in the millions for victims of sexual assault,” Duquesne University law professor Wes Oliver said.
Widener University law professor John Culhane said the controversial Freeh Report's scathing indictment of Penn State could gain additional weight should a jury convict Curley and Schultz for failing to report allegations against Sandusky and lying to a grand jury. The Freeh Report was released in July.
Curley and Schultz, who are slated to stand trial in January, maintain their innocence.
Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Rossi: It’s past time for NFL to protect players
- Steelers players say they support Tomlin’s attempts at deception
- Steelers’ Roethlisberger reported symptoms that led to his exit vs. Seahawks
- Steelers stalled by Seahawks, on outside of AFC wild-card picture
- Week 12 — Steelers-Seahawks gameday grades
- Steelers notebook: Seahawks’ Sherman gets better of WR Brown
- Family of man accused of shooting St. Clair officer say allegations don’t fit his character
- Muslim civil rights group seeks investigation into shooting of Pittsburgh taxi driver
- Community comes together to mourn death of St. Clair police officer
- Pennsylvania Game Commission reaps revenue from shale gas under game lands
- Sports Deli is latest tenant to say goodbye to Parkway Center Mall