Harvard hires CMU's vice president of research
Richard McCullough, Carnegie Mellon University's vice president for research and a key player in Pittsburgh's technology community, will leave CMU on Oct. 15 to become vice provost for research at Harvard University, Harvard officials said Thursday.
Harvard Provost Alan Garber said McCullough, a “prominent chemist” and “recognized leader in interdisciplinary science, research and entrepreneurship,” was named to the post after a national search.
McCullough, 53, CMU's Thomas Lord Professor in Chemistry, joined the faculty at CMU in 1990 and became Dean of the Mellon College of Science in 2001. He has headed CMU's research arm since 2007.
CMU President Jared Cohon hailed McCullough's accomplishments.
“Rick has helped to speed university innovations from the research lab to the marketplace, increasing the annual number of CMU startups significantly. ... He was essential in launching our Greenlighting Startups initiative, creating a university-wide infrastructure to support campus incubator groups in their startup efforts,” Cohon said.
McCullough founded Plextronics Inc., a company that employs 80 and was named 2006 Startup of the Year by the Organic Semiconductors Industry and one of the top 10 startups by Greentech.
McCullough could not be reached for comment.
Cohon said CMU has yet to identify a successor for McCullough.
Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.