Share This Page

State names new Pittsburgh prison superintendent

| Friday, Oct. 5, 2012, 12:00 p.m.

The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections has name a new superintendent for the prison at Woods Run.

Mark Capozza, who had been the deputy superintendent at the state prison in Greene County, is the new boss at the State Correctional Institution-Pittsburgh.

Capozza is replacing Daniel Burns, who had been superintendent in Pittsburgh for a little more than a year before moving to take the same job at the state prison in Forest County.

Burns had replaced an interim superintendent named after Melvin Lockett and two other administrators were fired last year during an investigation that eventually led to charges against four guards who are awaiting trial on charges of physically or sexually abusing inmates, especially those serving time for sex crimes against children.

The Pittsburgh prison has about 550 employees and houses 1,850 adult male inmates.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.