Share This Page

Greensburg man accused in tire iron attack

| Monday, Dec. 10, 2012, 12:18 p.m.

A 29-year-old Greensburg man was jailed Sunday on $250,000 bail after police accused him of severely beating his estranged wife with a tire iron.

Robert A. Emerick of 575 Willow Ave. is charged with attempted homicide, aggravated assault and recklessly endangering another person as a result of the 4:21 a.m. assault Sunday against Cori Nowalk, said Greensburg Police Detective Jerry Vernail.

Nowalk suffered multiple fractures to her head, face, upper torso and lower extremities, Vernail said. She was flown by medical helicopter to UPMC Presbyterian hospital in Pittsburgh for treatment.

“Early Sunday, Mr. Emerick saw his soon-to-be-ex in a South Greensburg bar and immediately left,” said police Capt. George Seranko.

When Nowalk arrived home, she locked the door and went into her bedroom.

“She made a telephone call to a friend and heard a noise and it was her ex-husband. He began assaulting her with a tire iron,” Seranko said.

Seranko said Nowalk was able to telephone 911 and summon police and an ambulance.

“When Mr. Emerick fled the residence, he broke the front door chain and the lock,” Seranko said.

Police said Emerick fled the home with the couple's daughter.

Seranko said Emerick eventually was apprehended by police at the Wal-Mart in East Huntingdon Sunday morning after he telephoned a family member.

“We understand he was planning on dropping off his daughter and fleeing,” Seranko said.

Emerick was arraigned before Harrison City District Judge Helen Kistler. A preliminary hearing will be scheduled before Greensburg District Judge James Albert.

Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 or ppeirce@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.