Pittsburgh city council postpones vote on parking meter enforcement
By Bob Bauder
Published: Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012, 1:37 p.m.
A divided Pittsburgh City Council on Wednesday postponed a vote on legislation that would forever eliminate nighttime enforcement of parking meters.
Councilman Bill Peduto, who sponsored the legislation, said evening parking enforcement hurts small, neighborhood businesses that depend on customers who park at metered spaces. City restaurant owners who appeared before council agreed.
Opponents said the cash-strapped city needs the money.
Council in 2010 extended meter enforcement hours to 10 p.m. Downtown and in Shadyside, Squirrel Hill, Oakland, the North Shore, the South Side and the Strip District to generate more revenue. Reacting to public outcry last year, council amended the legislation temporarily, returning enforcement to 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. through this year.
Enforcement in the seven neighborhoods is set to extend to 10 p.m. starting in January.
Council in December 2010 avoided state takeover of the city's underfunded pension by committing $735 million in parking tax revenue over 30 years to the system. Council intended to use additional revenue from increased parking rates and expanded enforcement hours to offset the loss of parking taxes in the budget.
Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Penguins’ Neal suspended five games for Marchand hit
- Expert: KO doesn’t mean ‘worst’ concussion for Pens’ Orpik
- Lawmakers accuse UPMC of political-style attacks over insurance bill
- Steelers WR Brown says ‘I thought I had it clean’ after wild, near-miss finish
- Eminent domain panel values Flight 93 crash site at $1.5 million
- UPMC doctor killed trying to help at 50-vehicle pileup
- Kovacevic: Enough of these Steelers already
- CMU names Kovacevic department head at engineering school
- Penguins players are not out looking for fights
- Aliquippa’s Henry picks West Virginia over Pitt
- Robinson: $500K proposal for August Wilson Center brought threats, vitriol