Share This Page

Richland contractor sues, claims he was made a scapegoat

| Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012, 2:50 p.m.

A Richland contractor claims in a lawsuit moved to federal court Thursday that the city and one of its building inspectors made him the scapegoat after a Sheraden house was mistakenly demolished.

John Deller, president of P.J. Deller Inc. and Deller Professional Services Inc., claims the city has yet to pay him the $4,900 owed for the 2011 demolition of 3224 Motor St. and has also refused to award him any new contracts. Deller contends the city failed to tell him that the demolition had been suspended.

Deller originally sued the city and acting building inspection chief John Jennings in Allegheny County Common Pleas in November. The city moved the case to federal court because Deller claims that barring him from city contracts violates his constitutionally guaranteed due process rights.

City solicitor Dan Regan couldn't immediately be reached for comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.