Parents settle lawsuit with Monessen and one of its police officers
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012, 3:16 p.m.
The parents of a Monessen High School student who was shot with a Taser in 2010 have settled their federal lawsuit against Monessen and one of its police officers, according to court documents filed Thursday.
The parents, identified only by the initials M.T. and B.T., claimed that Officer Lloyd Aldrich used excessive force while arresting their son, identified only as M.T., during halftime at a basketball game. The city and Aldrich claim in their answer that M.T. was convicted of criminal charges and deny that Aldrich used excessive force during the arrest.
The incident stemmed from a fight between two teenage girls, which escalated into a riot at halftime of the Monessen-Washington boys' basketball game. The lawyer for the parents declined to comment. City Administrator John Harhai referred questions to City Solicitor Mark Spire, who couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Kovacevic: Big Ben’s contract clock ticking
- Talented center Sutter is proving to be ‘pretty important’ for Penguins
- Taillon among 6 Pirates send to minor league camp
- Penguins notebook: Beau Bennett returns to practice
- Analysis: Kesler still on Pens’ radar as Shero aims to bring back ‘Big 3’
- Parking tickets in Downtown Pittsburgh spark outrage
- Westmoreland County Courthouse in Greensburg to be featured in TV series
- Western Pennsylvania engineer aboard missing Malaysia Airlines flight
- Democratic governor candidate Wagner remains confident amid skepticism
- Pitt looking to enhance profile at ACC tourney
- Starkey: Steelers know when to say goodbye