Rezoning for $400M Strip District development finalized
By Bob Bauder
Published: Monday, Dec. 17, 2012, 1:50 p.m.
A divided Pittsburgh City Council on Monday finalized legislation that rezones land where a $400 million development would be built in the Strip District.
Council approved the bill 5-4 with Patrick Dowd, Bill Peduto, Bruce Kraus and Natalia Rudiak voting against it. The Buncher Co. can exceed building density and height limitations, among other things, on its 55 acres of property, now consisting primarily vacant parking lots between 11th and 21st streets, from Smallman Street to the Allegheny River.
Dowd, Peduto, Kraus and Rudiak argued for a larger setback along the Allegheny River and against gates limiting traffic on several streets in the development. Part of the iconic Produce Terminal also would be demolished and renovated if the project proceeds.
Dowd is holding up legislation that would provide $50 million in tax-increment financing for things such as water and sewer lines in the development. Tax-increment financing uses extra property taxes generated by development to repay loans. Buncher has not said whether the financing plan is a deal-breaker.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Chamber event targets small business, health care
- Panthers free agent safety headed to Steelers
- Elizabeth Forward, Mt. Pleasant set for rematch in PIAA playoffs
- Monessen cops charge city man in chase case
- Orpik rises to occasion as Penguins take down Capitals once again
- West Homestead discusses lock boxes
- N. Belle Vernon eyes cop pension change
- Monessen’s PIAA run ends, 69-65
- Market high on buyback fever
- Clairton officials hope demolition project shows a sign of good things to come
- Penguins notebook: Letang skating, but no return set