Judge denies Orie Melvin claim of immunity
An Allegheny County judge on Friday denied a motion by suspended state Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin, who argued that her job as a judge made her immune to criminal prosecution.
Judge Lester G. Nauhaus said Melvin will stand trial on charges she used her Superior Court office to run for a seat on the Supreme Court in 2003 and 2009.
Melvin's attorney argued that her prosecution was “unprecedented and constitutionally flawed” because of the separation of powers of the executive and judicial branches of government.
Nauhaus said it was not.
Melvin, 56, of Marshall and her sister and former judicial staffer Janine Orie, 58, of McCandless are scheduled to stand trial on Jan. 23.
An Allegheny County jury in March convicted a third sister, former state Sen. Jane Orie, of similar charges. She is serving 2 1⁄2 to 10 years in prison
Adam Brandolph is a reporter for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.