Whitehall woman sues Rite Aid Corp., says cookies sold there made her sick
A Whitehall woman filed a lawsuit Wednesday against Rite Aid Corp. for allegedly selling her a tin of bacteria-filled cookies.
Coleen Lester, 57, claims Rite Aid was negligent for not ensuring the quality of the Rich Fields Butter Cookies and failing to store them at appropriate temperatures.
Lester said she purchased the cookies at a Rite Aid in Oakland in October 2011 and soon after she ate them she suffered severe stomach aches and cramping. She was admitted to UPMC Presbyterian hospital for treatment and was out of work for about three weeks.
According to the lawsuit, Rite Aid later recalled the cookies after receiving calls about multiple people becoming sick after eating them.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Vermont’s Sanders considers run for president
- Steelers not receiving big returns on their offseason investments
- ‘Racy’ emails could stay hidden under Pennsylvania open records law
- McKeesport won’t waver after shutout loss to Penn-Trafford
- Rossi: Given start, it’s time for Pitt to finish
- Steelers intrigued by athleticism of free agent Jones
- Ambitious few are turning lighthouses into living spaces
- Man accidentally shoots himself in North Point Breeze
- Rare triple play sparks Pirates’ comeback victory over Cubs
- Federal statistics raise red flags about America’s growing diabetes crisis
- U.S. beacon of hope for world’s transplant patients