Couple wanted in burglary of Ross pastor's home arrested in Butler County
A couple wanted for burglarizing a pastor's home while he was conducting a church service on Christmas Eve have been arrested in Butler County, according to police.
Butler Township police spotted Jeremiah Kelly, 26, and Jessica Hirth, 28, both of Ross, along Route 8 in a Chevy HHR that was reported stolen in Shaler and took the couple into custody about 3 p .m. Saturday, authorities said.
Kelly and Hirth are accused of entering the Rev. Michael Guthrie's home on Babcock Boulevard and stealing credit cards, jewelry, a gun and items that belonged to Guthrie's deceased son, according to Ross police. Guthrie is pastor of Cornerstone Church in Ross.
The pair were being held in the Butler County Jail awaiting extradition to Allegheny County to face charges of burglary, receiving stolen property and conspiracy.
Hirth is Guthrie's niece.
On Friday night, Ross police arrested Kelly's mother, Teresa Lenz, 53, of Ross on charges of obstruction and hindering apprehension.
Police said Guthrie and a Ross police officer went to Lenz's after the burglary but the woman hid the fact that the couple was hiding in her home.
Guthrie was trying to retrieve some of the stolen items and had hoped to persuade his niece to seek treatment for the drug problem he believes was the motivation for the thefts, police said.
Lenz posted a $5,000 bond and was released from the Allegheny County Jail on Saturday. A preliminary hearing on the charges is scheduled for Wednesday.
Tony LaRussa is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7987 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.