Search teams look for missing man at Ohiopyle State Park
Search and rescue teams continued to scour Ohiopyle State Park on Thursday for a man who has been missing since Monday.
Relatives of the 29-year-old man, who officials would not name, reported him missing around 11 a.m. Wednesday after they discovered his car in a parking lot at the state park, assistant park manager Stacie Hall said.
“They were concerned because they had not heard from him since New Year's Eve and knew he was at Ohiopyle and came here looking for him,” Hall said.
The search was suspended Wednesday at nightfall and resumed Thursday morning.
Search teams looked for the man until dark Thursday and planned to resume Friday morning, Hall said.
Search personnel have spent the nighttime hours planning the search of the 20,500-acre park for the next day.
“All we know for sure is his starting point at his vehicle,” Hall said.
She said search teams are investigating the man's travel plans and using his age, physical condition, and activity history to determine likely areas of the park where he might be found.
“He has been here before, so he has a vague familiarity with the area,” she added.
The searchers, numbering as many as 40 on the ground at a time, include Ohiopyle State Park staff, Forbes State Forest personnel, the Fayette County Sheriff's Department Search and Rescue Team, Appalachian Mountain Rescue, the Ohiopyle-Stewart and South Connellsville volunteer fire departments and several dog teams, Hall said.
Jennifer Reeger is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6155 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers sign 7th-rounder Holliman
- Chesney fans flood the North Shore
- Steelers nose tackle McCullers finds performance, fitness go hand in hand
- Outdoor notices: May 31, 2015
- Hurdle takes responsibility for mistakes that ended Pirates’ 7-game win streak
- CBS’ Bob Schieffer is ready for retirement
- Construction worker dies in Wilkinsburg
- Soap Summary: Siblings Lulu and Nikolas commiserate over upsetting events
- Mars doubles partners want more after getting PIAA bronze
- Lightning hits Rostraver home; child hurt
- ‘Two-party stranglehold’ on debates in group’s sights