Second lawsuit filed against Greene County coal operation
A second citizens group has filed suit in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh claiming that a Greene County coal operation is polluting water.
According to a lawsuit filed Wednesday, Citizens Coal Council, a Bridgeville-based grassroots group, said Emerald Coal has been illegally discharging mine wastewater and stormwater runoff from its Franklin longwall coal mine into creeks and tributaries of the South Fork Ten Mile and Whitely Creek watersheds since January 2008, violating the federal Clean Water Act.
The suit also names Alpha Natural Resources of Bristol, Va., the parent company of Emerald, and Foundation Coal Corporation of Maryland, which owned the mine until the company merged with Alpha in 2009.
On Monday, the Center for Coalfield Justice in Washington filed suit in federal court in Pittsburgh, saying that Emerald exceeded state and federal water pollution limits at least 400 times in the past five years.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.