Parents sue Big Beaver Falls school district, claim discrimination against student
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Jan. 4, 2013, 10:46 a.m.
The parents of a former Big Beaver Elementary School student claim in a lawsuit filed Thursday that school officials deliberately avoided evaluating their son for disabilities despite evidence that he has Asperger syndrome.
Identified only by initials, the parents of J.P., claim a state hearing officer ruled June 12 that the Big Beaver Falls Area School District discriminated against their son and had a policy prohibiting school staff from identifying children with possible disabilities. The hearing officer also agreed to their claims that the district had failed to protect their son from harassment by other students, the lawsuit says.
Their son attended the elementary school from 2007 until 2010, when they moved to another district, the lawsuit says. The parents filed the lawsuit as a class-action on behalf of all Big Beaver Falls students with disabilities and their parents.
Jeffrey Ruder, the parent's lawyer, couldn't immediately be reached for comment. Lee Price, the district's lawyer, declined comment.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Starkey: Steelers know when to say goodbye
- Analysis: Kesler remains on Penguins’ radar as Shero looks bring back ‘Big 3’ formula
- Pirates’ big risk with pitch-heavy draft focus might soon pay off
- With so many needs, Steelers can ill afford to miss in draft
- Ex-Colts executive Polian: Approach free agency with caution
- Obama losing close adviser to end 9 years of service
- Penguins GM Shero’s deadline deals: Addition by subtraction
- IUP students have raucous early St. Patrick’s Day celebration
- Pitt rallies in final seconds of regulation en route to OT win at Clemson
- Greensburg bishop’s time at helm draws to a close
- Steelers defense doesn’t make the grade in 2013 review