New Kensington woman gets up to 10 years in prison for fatal Penn Hills accident
An Allegheny County judge on Monday sentenced a New Kensington woman to five to 10 years in prison for killing a Penn Hills woman in a head-on crash.
Judge Joseph K. Williams also sentenced Kayla Dawn Hoffman, 29, to 15 years of probation with weekly drug testing.
Hoffman pleaded guilty to third- degree murder, homicide by vehicle while under the influence, involuntary manslaughter and other charges in the Feb. 18 death of Kayla Johnson-Ukeyne, 25.
Johnson-Ukeyne's family and friends cried in the courtroom as her aunt Gina Marshman read a statement describing how the “jovial” woman has and will be missed.
“There is a piece of my heart broken, and I struggle every day to hold back tears,” Marshman said.
Prosecutors said Hoffman was fleeing from police when the Ford Explorer she was driving passed a pickup truck at the crest of a hill on Verona Road in Penn Hills and crashed into Johnson-Ukeyne's car. Police said Hoffman had heroin and cocaine in her system and in her possession at the time of the crash.
Hoffman was hospitalized for a week and has been in the county jail since then.
Marshman turned to Hoffman during the sentencing hearing and told her she felt sad for her.
“Do I hate you? No. I don't hate you. I'm sad for you that you don't value your life enough, that you don't want to change it,” she said.
Family members said Johnson-Ukeyne was a home health aide training to become a veterinary technician.
Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.