Wisconsin group argues against Ten Commandments at Fayette school
By Liz Zemba
Published: Wednesday, January 9, 2013, 10:00 a.m.
Updated: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
A Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of Connellsville Junior High School differs from others in public places because children cannot help but see it as they attend required classes, according to a Wisconsin-based group that wants the monument to be removed.
“That these impressionable young students encounter this monument frequently is significant,” attorneys wrote in a legal brief seeking to prevent dismissal of the group's federal civil rights lawsuit. “The monument is not labeled ‘The Ten Suggestions.' In large font it says, 'the Ten Commandments.' The monument proclaims, ‘I am the LORD thy God' and lists 10 religious edicts.”
Donated by the Connellsville Eagles, the 6-foot-tall stone monument stood unchallenged outside the junior high school for 55 years until September, when the Freedom From Religion Foundation filed a civil lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh seeking its removal. Filed on behalf of an anonymous parent and student, the foundation's lawsuit contends the monument violates the First Amendment, which holds that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.
In seeking to dismiss the case, attorneys for the school district argued, among other reasons, that the monument should stay because it is more secular than religious. Courts in other cases found that similar monuments on government-owned property do not violate the establishment clause, they argued, including one at the Texas State Capitol that survived a Supreme Court challenge.
In its brief, the foundation said the Texas case does not apply to Connellsville because Texas' monument is in a park with 38 others of a historical nature. Connellsville's stands alone, the foundation argued, and its location outside the school's auditorium forces students — required by law to go to school — to view it as they attend outdoor gym classes or board and exit buses.
“At a high level, this case addresses a large, stone Ten Commandments monument displayed prominently on public school grounds within view of impressionable junior high school students, not a Ten Commandments monument located on large, open public grounds, among a number of other monuments, where passers-by may avoid the display,” the foundation's attorneys wrote.
“The courts of the United States have, over many years, drawn a clear distinction between the treatment of religious display cases in the public school setting and those cases involving religious display on other public grounds.”
The foundation notes the Supreme Court historically has “recognized a heightened vigilance” in reviewing “religious displays on public school grounds where impressionable children are in attendance.”
No court has found a Ten Commandments' display at a public school to be constitutional, its attorneys said in the brief.
Community response to the foundation's request to have the monument removed has only bolstered its contention the monument sends a religious message, the attorneys said. That response has included rallies, vigils, pleas to the school board to keep the monument in place after initially saying it would be taken down, and the repeated removal of covers that the district placed over the monument until the court case is resolved.
“This conduct supports the plausibility of plaintiffs' claims that the other members of plaintiffs' community ascribe religious importance to the monument and that defendant's decision to keep the monument is rooted in its favoring a particular religion,” the attorneys wrote in the 33-page brief.
The anonymous parent is an atheist, according to the lawsuit. The student is nonreligious. The foundation's attorneys contend the two “do not subscribe to the idea that they are commanded to follow the edicts on the monument, and they are offended by it.”
Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Kovacevic: The smartest man in hockey
- Penguins far from satisfied after Game 2
- Uniontown man killed in shooting
- Organization helps cancer-stricken mother see her kids attend prom
- Indiana County man charged in assault on toddler
- Penguins notebook: Malkin makes points run
- Error in 9th allows Pirates to rally past Astros
- Variety of techniques can help fishermen creel walleyes
- Behind Crosby’s hat trick, Penguins sneak past Senators
- Ex-Steelers QB Batch learns new form of 2-minute drill
- Powerball officials: 80 percent of number combinations picked
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.
Tom: This scam has been proposed elsewhere and rejected by the courts. It reminds me of arguing in the 60's about how we can set up a separate school for Blacks that won't really be different from the White school. Justice Breyer speaking for a majority was clear in 2005: The Ten Commandments do not belong on school property. Just take it down and post the Bill of Rights. There is some needed lessons in Civics 101 in this town.
Submitted by: Tom on Friday, January 11, 2013
This problem can be resolved. The school district can hold a benefit auction for the ground underneath and the monument. The winning bidder is bound (even if it is just $1 ) to sign the deed and title over back to Fraternal Order of Eagles, or similar group that will take the deed and preserve the monument. It would no longer be on public ground, the suit would be baseless. Everybody including the godless family wins. The winning bidder is a local hero, the School District is off the hook and has a few extra $$ in it's pockets. The expense of moving the monument is avoided. The monument is preserved, and no longer is government owned property.
Submitted by: Keith on Thursday, January 10, 2013
At the minimum the impression given is positive on life and the living of life. If these statements are considered as dogma by a minority, do not look at them when you pass by.
Submitted by: Walter on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Our country was founded on Christian principles and belief in God. These pieces of garbage should stay the hell out of areas that are hundreds of miles from their homes. Ever since Obama became president, you can throw any Christian values out the window. Maybe this is the reason that the USA will not be around much longer!
Submitted by: Sam on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
The complaint is from a local student, by way of FFRF, and the monument needs to come down. In 2005, Supreme Court Justice Breyer wrote that Ten Commandments do NOT belong “on the grounds of a public school, where, given the impressionability of the young, government must exercise particular care in separating church and state." It is a waste of time to fight what will be a losing and expensive battle for the school. Keep church dogma in church, and not in a public school.
Submitted by: M on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
These people are sick.
Submitted by: Anthony on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
The monument is educational at the very least. It displays the values upon which the United States was founded. These are the values used by the founding fathers to frame the Constitution. The Freedom From Religion organization does not speak for the country. They should go waste their time on some other destructive cause.