Share This Page

Man pleads guilty to disrupting Atlanta to Pittsburgh flight

| Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2013, 12:02 p.m.

A Georgia man pleaded guilty on Tuesday to fighting with flight attendants and passengers during an Atlanta-Pittsburgh AirTran flight on Oct. 10.

Marc Anthony Malone, 34, of Hogansville, Ga., admitted to wandering around the plane's cabin, opening bins and talking to himself until he asked a flight attendant where he was.

When the attendant told him he was on a plane headed for Pittsburgh, Malone said, “I need to get off now” and started trying to reach the cockpit, according to an affidavit by FBI Special Agent Anthony Rodriguez.

After the crew headed off his repeated attempts to reach the front of the plane, Malone screamed profanities and knocked one male flight attendant down, the affidavit says.

Two flight attendants and five passengers wrestled Malone to the floor, and an eighth person put his hands and feet in flexible handcuffs, the affidavit says. Malone kept threatening the crew until his removal in Pittsburgh.

U.S. District Judge Gustave Diamond scheduled Malone's sentencing for May 8 and allowed him to remain free on a $10,000 bond.

Malone and his lawyer, Assistant Federal Public Defender Jay Finkelstein, declined comment.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301or bbowling@tribweb.com

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.