Carlow University president to retire at end of July
The first president of Carlow University not to have been a nun plans to retire later this year, she announced.
Mary Hines, who has led Carlow since 2005, said in her State of the University Address Tuesday that she would retire at the end of her contract July 31.
“The university is well positioned to allow me to move on to a new phase in my life,” she said in a statement.
“My family asked me to promise to come home when my current contract expires, and I intend to honor that promise,” said Hines, who will move to the Baltimore area to be closer to her family. “The university is doing well enough for me to move on.”
Hines was the ninth president of the 2,346-student Oakland-based Catholic school, and the first not to have been drawn from the Sisters of Mercy, said spokesman Drew Wilson.
In the time Hines has been president, the university has doubled its graduate school enrollment and the number of full-time faculty members; sextupled the 2005 market value of the university's endowment and added several of the largest financial gifts in its history; and increased the university's visibility and reputation in the city.
A native of New York City, Hines earned her Master's degree and Doctorate in philosophy from The Catholic University of America Washington, D.C. Starting in 1973, she was a professor of philosophy at eight different schools in the Baltimore area and held several administrative positions at Dundalk and Catonsville, Md., community colleges before becoming Campus Executive Officer of Penn State's Wilkes-Barre campus in 1997.
Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5625 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.