TribLIVE

| News

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Jerry Sandusky's lawyers argue for new trial

Puskar | Associated Press
Former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky, center, arrives at the Centre County Courthouse for a post-sentence motion in Bellefonte, Pa., Thursday, Jan. 10, 2013. Thursday's hearing in Bellefonte is expected to delve into the legal challenges filed by Sandusky's lawyers, including their claim that a deluge of prosecution materials swamped the defense. Sandusky is serving a 30- to 60-year prison sentence after being convicted in June of 45 counts of child sexual abuse. Gene J.

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By The Associated Press
Thursday, Jan. 10, 2013, 9:24 a.m.
 

BELLEFONTE, Pa. — Jerry Sandusky emerged from prison to attend a hearing 200 miles away at which his lawyers argued Thursday he deserves a new trial on child molestation charges because they didn't have enough time to prepare for the first one.

The 68-year-old former Penn State assistant coach played no active role in the proceedings, but briefly greeted his wife and supporters beforehand.

At the hearing in Centre County court in Bellefonte, Sandusky's lawyers cited flaws in the trial, including that they were swamped by about 12,000 pages of documents and other materials, that Judge John Cleland should have instructed jurors about the years it took for victims to report he had abused them, and that hearsay evidence was improperly allowed.

But prosecutors countered by showing most of the documents and records were not relevant to the trial. They also got lead defense attorney Joe Amendola to acknowledge that he did not find any he would have used when he reviewed them after the trial.

"Where's the harm?" the judge asked Sandusky defense lawyer Norris Gelman. "That's where I'm hung up on this one."

Cleland did not indicate when he might rule. If Sandusky does not get a new trial — he is also asking to have charges thrown out entirely — he can then appeal to Superior Court, and has indicated he will.

Sandusky was convicted in June of 45 counts of child sexual abuse over a period of several years and is serving a 30- to 60-year sentence at a state prison. He has maintained his innocence, but his arrest tarnished Penn State's vaunted football program and led to the firing of longtime coach Joe Paterno, who died nearly a year ago from lung cancer.

Gelman noted that some of the victims waited more than a decade to disclose their abuse.

"This is a long, long time not to make some kind of report ... and it goes to their credibility," Gelman said.

Prosecutor Frank Fina told Cleland that the issue of "failure to report" by the victims was a major theme during the trial. It was brought up during both parties' opening statements and closing arguments and during cross-examination of the eight victims who testified against Sandusky, he said.

Amendola's performance at trial and his questioning of witnesses are evidence that a fair trial took place even though the case moved from arrest to verdict in about eight months, Fina said.

"He used everything he had to cross-examine these young men," Fina said.

Amendola, who testified Thursday, said the trial's timetable did not permit sufficient investigation into the accusers' backgrounds.

He also described a scramble to cope with a string of pretrial hearings while trying to adequately analyze the discovery materials. At one point, his copier even broke down.

"Did we look at the material? Yes, we glanced over it," he said under questioning by Gelman.

Amendola recounted how he and co-counsel Karl Rominger sought unsuccessfully to be taken off the case, evidence of their frustration over how quickly things were moving.

After the hearing, Gelman compared Sandusky's odds of a new trial to a three-point shot in basketball, while Fina downplayed the defense's chances of success.

"I think the people of Pennsylvania can be confident this conviction is going to stand," Fina told reporters.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Developers share their vision for Garden Theater block on North Side
  2. Past, present, future WPIAL standouts competing at USA Diving Junior and Senior Nationals
  3. Slot cornerback Boykin should give Steelers options in secondary
  4. Muni bond funds stressed
  5. Starting 9: Examining Pirates’ deadline decisions
  6. Biertempfel: Players, MLB agree logic of season’s setup needs to be examined
  7. Penguins not alone in top-heavy approach to salary cap
  8. Carnegie Museum of Natural History’s banding program a labor of love for avian expert
  9. Reds solve Cole, stave off Pirates’ 9th-inning rally
  10. Steelers’ Harrison awaits go-ahead from Tomlin before practicing
  11. Pittsburgh airport improvements noted as CEO tries to expand activity