Judge limits parties at Chukky Okobi's Shadyside mansion
The ongoing legal battle between former Steelers center Chukky Okobi and his neighbors over the use of his Shadyside mansion bed-and-breakfast continued this week when a judge limited the number of loud events he can hold there.
Common Pleas Judge Robert Colville ruled Wednesday that the Mansion at Maple Heights is limited to four outdoor events per year that use live or amplified music consistent with “dance,” “party,” “band” or “wedding reception”-style music or entertainment.
The judge did not restrict wedding ceremonies or other outdoor events that use non-amplified, or very nominally amplified, musical or vocal accompaniment.
Damon Thomas, one of Okobi's attorneys, said the neighbors were seeking to shut down the Mansion, but the judge restricted only “some” outdoor music.
“We don't believe (the order) will interfere with the operation of the business,” Thomas said.
He declined to say whether Okobi would appeal.
Jordan Strassburger, an attorney for the neighbors, said his clients never sought to close the business.
“They complained about the music that was the product of the yearly 25 to 30 outdoor wedding receptions that significantly disrupted their ability to enjoy their own properties,” Strassburger said.
The bed-and-breakfast hosts weddings, corporate retreats and other social gatherings of up to 150 people, according to its website.
His neighbors sued in July 2011, claiming the parties blared loud music with lighting that continued late into the night.
Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7886 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.