NCAA to hold Penn State fine money until lawsuit is settled
A Centre County lawmaker on Thursday said the NCAA has agreed not to spend any of the $12 million Penn State has paid in fines related to the Sandusky child sex scandal pending the resolution of a lawsuit he filed against the agency.
State Sen. Jake Corman, a Republican and Penn State alumnus, has been adamant that the fine money — $60 million to be paid in $12 million-a-year installments for five years — remain in Pennsylvania for distribution to child abuse prevention agencies here rather than to those across the country, as the NCAA proposed.
Corman filed a motion Jan. 7 seeking a preliminary injunction to prohibit the NCAA from releasing any of the money and later filed suit asking the court to bar the NCAA from releasing it.
NCAA officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
In papers filed in Commonwealth Court on Tuesday, attorneys for the NCAA said the agency had no intention to “disburse or dissipate funds in the immediate future” and agreed to give Corman written notice 60 days in advance of any intended disbursement.
“I believe keeping the money in Pennsylvania is not only appropriate, but also will significantly help the state achieve the goals and preparedness the Pennsylvania Task Force on Child Protection spells out,” Corman said.
Gov. Tom Corbett has filed suit seeking to overturn the NCAA's sanctions against the university.
Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.