Driver thrown from car Downtown after 'horrific' crash into pole near T-station, police say
Police investigate the scene of an accident on Liberty Avenue, Downtown, on Friday, January 18, 2013.
Photo by Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
The driver of a car involved in a “horrific” crash Downtown Friday morning might have been having a medical issue, Pittsburgh police Cmdr. Eric Holmes said.
An autopsy is scheduled Saturday on Donald Fox, 80, of Banksville, a spokesman for the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office said.
Fox was heading inbound on the Parkway and possibly hit another vehicle before crashing into a pole in a median near the Gateway T station on Liberty Avenue, Holmes said.
“It looks like a horrific accident,” he said.
Witnesses told police the vehicle was traveling at a high rate of speed when it crashed around 10:40 a.m., Holmes said. “You can tell it was quite an impact,” he said.
Fox was thrown from the vehicle, which was mangled beyond recognition and left pushed against the pole. He was taken to UPMC Mercy, Uptown, and died at 11:08 a.m., the medical examiner's spokesman said.
No one else was hurt.
Dave Fish and Eric Damon said they were working on the 19th floor of the Gateway 4 building when they looked out the window and saw the driver lying motionless in the street.
“I'm just shocked,” said Damon, 34, of Lower Burrell. “I never saw that before.”
Liberty Avenue was closed near Stanwix Street until police completed their crash site investigation.
Margaret Harding is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8519 or email@example.com. Staff writer Michael Hasch contributed to this report.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.