Wagner: Reassessment to give county too much money, recommends millage change
By Bobby Kerlik
Published: Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, 12:50 p.m.
Standing next to a sign containing the image of a $50 bill, Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagner said on Thursday that property owners are paying too much in county taxes because leaders failed to lower the millage enough to offset the rise in reassessed value.
“We're asking the executive and County Council to correct it now,” Wagner said at a news conference. “I have major concerns over the millage rate and that the county is overcharging taxpayers and breaking state law.”
Her comments sparked a sharp rebuke from County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, who said at his own news conference that the county is not overcharging and will not reap a windfall from the court-ordered reassessment.
“They're being misled by the county controller,” Fitzgerald said. “We feel very confident in our numbers.”
Under state law, taxing bodies cannot reap more than 5 percent in additional revenue from property taxes in the year after a reassessment.
The millage debate is the latest clash between the two Democrats, who have grappled over cuts to the controller's budget, Fitzgerald's taking control of the Department of Weights and Measures, and Wagner's ideas for bringing in more money for the Port Authority.
In December, County Council approved Fitzgerald's proposal to reduce property taxes from 5.69 mills to 4.73 mills, a 17 percent reduction, because property values went up under the reassessment.
Fitzgerald said the millage rate was lowered enough so that county property tax income would stay roughly the same.
Wagner said Fitzgerald and council should lower property taxes by a half mill to 4.23 mills. That means the owner of a $100,000 home would save $50 in taxes.
The difference in the millage rates stems from how much Wagner and Fitzgerald claim is the overall assessed value of property in the county.
Wagner says the overall assessed value is $79.6 billion. She contends the county is on track to collect an extra $30 million to $38 million in taxes.
Fitzgerald maintains that the county's overall assessed value is $71.2 billion. He's relying on a decrease in values estimated to come from thousands of outstanding appeals from property owners. When property owners win reductions in their assessment through appeals, that lowers the county's overall assessed value.
County manager William McKain said at least 600 high-value properties have appeals pending before the Board of Viewers.
“We have to forecast and account for that,” McKain said. “We're making our best guess estimate.”
Wagner said her number takes into account more than 100,000 appeals that have been decided.
The controller left open the possibility that she would sue the county administration to force it to comply with her proposed millage rate.
She also announced that her office would examine each school district and municipality to ensure it meets the anti-windfall provision.
Bobby Kerlik is a staff writerfor Trib Total Media. He canbe reached at 412-320-7886or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Analysis: Steelers could fill needs with free agents while not spending big bucks
- Steelers to release LaMarr Woodley; Taylor restructures contract
- Police charge Westmoreland County priest in $124,000 theft case
- Woman sues UPMC over pregnancy drug test
- Pittsburgh’s Rubber Duck to be redeployed to Norfolk
- Crosby lifts Penguins over Capitals in last game of road trip
- 2 Jeannette women rescued from burning apartment building
- Pittsburgh council introduces resolution to pay Rocco’s vet bills
- Legislators propose bill to split up Pennsylvania-owned university system
- Job cuts at AGH part of ‘strategic’ process
- Ordinance requires Pittsburgh government to publish data online