Tensions rise between state university system, union faculty
Tensions between the State System of Higher Education and the union that represents faculty at the 14 state-owned universities ratcheted up on Thursday as union members marched on a meeting of the system's board of governors in Harrisburg and said they would spend the weekend preparing to strike.
Steve Hicks, president of the Association of State College and University Faculties, said faculty members, who have worked without a contract since June 30, 2011, planned to adjourn to a two-day workshop in which they would discuss strike preparations.
Classes are scheduled to resume on Monday for 115,000 students at the 14 schools, including Indiana, Slippery Rock and California universities in Western Pennsylvania.
Although the association has yet to take a strike vote, union leaders previously discussed the possibility of staging a walkout on Jan. 28 or Feb. 5.
State system spokesman Kenn Marshall said students should plan to return to school over the weekend and be in class on Monday. Each university, he said, made preparations to stay open in case of a strike.
While the two sides reached an agreement on salary issues, they remain at odds over health care benefits for faculty and retirees. State system officials proposed offering new employees the option of selecting a defined contribution plan for health care retirement benefits and seek to enroll faculty members in a lower-cost plan in place for other state workers.
Debra Erdley is a staff writer for TribTotal Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Penguins confident Pouliot will be healthy, ready for camp
- Facebook fans fancy ‘I’m So Greensburg’
- Former longtime Steelers publicist Kiely dies
- Penn State football team savors cultural experience
- Trio holds up Penn couple at gunpoint in home
- Parents sue Penn Hills School District, allege assault by teacher
- Not to be left behind, speedy Steelers are on the fast track in NFL
- Pirates’ Cole growing in 1st full season
- St. Michael’s volunteers cook up festival delights
- FSU star QB Winston working to improve on, off field
- Feds approve compromise on Corbett’s alternative Medicaid plan