Share This Page

Federal judge dismisses Penn Hills student's civil rights lawsuit

| Friday, Jan. 25, 2013, 6:58 p.m.

Linton Middle School didn't expel a former student when he was assigned to alternative education, and the due process and unsupported racial discrimination claims by the student and his mother aren't enough to sustain a civil rights lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Arthur Schwab ruled Friday in dismissing the lawsuit.

Zyion Handburgh, then 13, and his mother, Michelle Berish of Penn Hills, sued the Penn Hills School District in November. They claimed Principal Shaun Cooke effectively expelled Handburgh in October after he disrupted a math class.

The district argued that Cooke never expelled Handburgh but suspended him for two days and assigned him to alternative education. Cooke also met with Berish several times to discuss the reassignment, the district said in court documents.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.