State denies eight cyber charter school applications
The state Department of Education announced on Monday it had denied applications from eight cyber charter schools seeking to open this fall, including one in Brentwood.
“The proposals submitted by the applicants lack adequate evidence and sufficient information of how prospective students would be offered quality academic programs,” Education Secretary Ron Tomalis said in a prepared statement. “In addition, the financial plans presented call into question each applicant's ability to maintain a long-term, viable educational program for the benefit of Pennsylvania students.”
The Department of Education oversees cyber charter schools, including the granting and revocation of a charter.
In late November, public hearings were held over a four-day period to provide each applicant an opportunity to defend its proposal and undergo questioning by department staff.
PHASE 4 America Cyber Charter School proposed opening in Brentwood, but Tomalis cited deficiencies in governance, finance and curriculum in denying the application.
The others the state rejected were Akoben Cyber Charter School in Philadelphia County, Insight PA Cyber Charter School in Delaware County, MB Resiliency Cyber Charter School in Philadelphia County, Mercury Online Cyber Charter School in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania Career Path Cyber Charter School in Lehigh County, Urban Cyber Charter School in York County and V3 Cyber Charter School in Dauphin County.
Each applicant has the option to appeal the decision to a state board.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Clues to Chief Justice John Roberts’ thinking on new ObamaCare case
- LaBar: Timing perfect for Sting’s debut at WWE’s Survivor Series
- NFL parity makes playoff chase a multi-team muddle
- Canteen features Woodruff tribute
- Iraqi family, torn apart for opposing Saddam, reunites in Pittsburgh
- Two-alarm fire reported in Swissvale
- Stretch of Route 56 to close
- CT scans can find smokers’ lung cancer early
- Horse racing industry banks on Wolf
- Burrell’s curriculum evolves creatively
- Finding balance between toughness, excessiveness key for Penguins’ Downie