York County man files lawsuit over prison hepatitis care
By Brian Bowling
Published: Monday, Jan. 28, 2013, 8:46 p.m.
A York County man claims in a federal lawsuit filed Monday in Pittsburgh that the Department of Corrections is violating the civil rights of several thousand inmates by refusing to treat their hepatitis C based on the length of their prison sentences.
Jason E. Runkle, 25, of Red Lion says in the proposed class-action lawsuit that he is serving a sentence of 18 months to five years at the State Correctional Institution at Mercer for his conviction on robbery and related crimes.
Because he received credit for time served, his minimum sentence was less than one year, so prison officials refused to provide further diagnosis and treatment after he tested positive for hepatitis C, the lawsuit says. Depending on the genotype, the treatment for hepatitis C takes either 24 weeks or 48 weeks, according to the lawsuit.
With an estimated 12 percent to 35 percent of inmates infected and more than 51,000 people in Pennsylvania's prisons, the policy affects as many as 17,850 inmates, the lawsuit says.
A Department of Corrections spokeswoman couldn't be reached for comment.
Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- Davis embraces new opportunity with Pirates
- Mail for IRS delivered to Squirrel Hill home
- NHL notebook: Bruins’ Lucic fined $5,000 for spearing
- NFL notebook: Pryor will be cut if he’s not traded
- Riverhounds squander 2-goal lead, settle for draw
- State police: People injured in Parkway crash resulting from police chase
- Instagram builds Oakmont barber’s rep for innovative cuts, ‘hair tattooing’
- Architecture photos show difference between drama, fact
- ‘Patriots’ back Nevada rancher; Reid labels them ‘domestic terrorists’
- Frye: Commission discusses ‘second opening day effect’