Share This Page

Computer glitch halts state's concealed-weapons permit process

| Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2013, 2:56 p.m.

Lines have snaked through the basement of the Westmoreland County Courthouse for weeks as people waited to obtain licenses to carry concealed weapons.

The rush came to an abrupt halt on Tuesday because of a glitch in the state computer system that handles licensing.

On average, more than 2,000 people obtained concealed-carry permits every weekday in January in the state, but none could this week because of the glitch, state police spokeswoman Maria Finn said.

Applicants can fill out paperwork, and authorities can conduct instant background checks, but Finn said sheriff's departments can't upload photographs and other data or issue licenses.

β€œIt's a problem with the database, and it's basically something that's technical. We don't know when it will be fixed,” Finn said.

In Westmoreland County, where the sheriff's department issued up to 100 permits a day this month, people went home empty-handed.

β€œPeople are pretty irate about it,” said Sheriff Jonathan Held.

Fayette County applicants were told to leave completed paperwork with the sheriff's office and to expect a phone call when the system is restored.

Allegheny County officials told applicants when they could return to the courthouse to pick up licenses, Chief Deputy Sheriff Joe Rizzo said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or rcholodofsky@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.