Man arrested in the slaying of McKees Rocks activist
The man accused of fatally beating a McKees Rocks clothing designer and community activist told a witness that he did so because the victim “robbed” him of some marijuana, according to a criminal complaint unsealed on Wednesday.
Sean Overton, 19, is charged with homicide in the death of Isaiah Dent, 61, whose body was found Monday morning inside his home in the Hays Manor housing project, Allegheny County Police Lt. Andrew Schurman said.
Overton, who has ties to the West End and McKees Rocks, was arrested without incident Wednesday at his mother's home in the Moon Crest housing complex in Moon, he said.
Schurman said it appeared that Dent was badly beaten. An autopsy showed he died of head injuries, a spokesman for the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office said.
Police say the charges were filed based upon two phone conversations that a witness apparently had with Overton.
“During the brief (first) phone call, (Overton) mentioned that he had settled some ‘unfinished business' with Isaiah Dent,” the complaint states.
About an hour later, police say, the witness received a second call.
“Overton told (the witness) that he killed Dent because Dent ‘robbed' him of some weed,” the complaint states. “Overton also stated that Dent shortchanged him on cash after he bought marijuana.”
Dent was president of the Hays Manor tenant council. Community activists have praised him for trying to improve the community.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.