Share This Page

Sheriff's sale of a Legion Post in Sewickley is postponed

| Monday, Feb. 4, 2013, 11:12 a.m.

A scheduled sheriff's sale of a Sewickley building that houses the Walter Robinson American Legion Post 450 is postponed until March 4.

The Allegheny County Sheriff‘s Department on Monday moved the sale of the post at 20 Chadwick St., though it did not make clear the reason for the postponement. Attorney Stephen Jurman, listed in court documents as the post's attorney, could not be reached.

The post's leaders filed for Chapter 11 reorganization bankruptcy in December 2011, citing about $125,000 in debt at the time.

Attorney James McNally, who represents the creditor, declined to comment.

A representative of the post could not be reached.

Membership at the post declined in recent years. Organizers held fundraisers to help it emerge from bankruptcy.

The post organized in 1922 when black residents could not join Legion Post 4 in Sewickley. The Robinson post once was a local hotspot that attracted prominent musicians of the Big Band era, including Ella Fitzgerald, Duke Ellington, Cab Calloway and Count Basie.

The organization received the old Sewickley Railroad Station, built in 1887, as a gift from the borough in 1944. The Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation designated the former train station a historic landmark in 1993.

Bobby Cherry is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-324-1408 or rcherry@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.