Share This Page

North Braddock drug suspect on run since 2001 arrested

| Friday, Feb. 1, 2013, 6:01 p.m.

A North Braddock man on the run since he was charged in 2001 with being a member of a multimillion-dollar Mon Valley drug ring was arrested in Swissvale on Friday by members of the U.S. Marshals Western Pennsylvania Fugitive Task Force.

Task force members arrested Neal Jones, 56, about 12:30 p.m. on Noble Street, said Michael Baughman, chief deputy U.S. Marshal. Jones was carrying a phony identification card from the state of California, Baughman said.

Jones was among 10 accused members of Tremayne “Munch” Briston's drug ring the state Attorney General's Office narcotics investigators charged in February 2001. The ring was accused of distributing $7 million in drugs during a three-year investigation.

Prosecutors withdrew most of the charges against Briston after New Jersey authorities charged him in a drug-related slaying there. Briston is serving a sentence of 17 to 20 years in prison in that state for his conviction on a charge of aggravated manslaughter, court records show.

Task force members also arrested a fugitive from Ohio in Washington County, Baughman said.

Randy Albertson, 37, is charged with gross sexual imposition and endangering the welfare of children in Clinton County, Ohio, Baughman said.

Task force members arrested him about 10:30 a.m. on Wheeling Street in Washington, Baughman said.

Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or at mhasch@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.