Parties endorse candidates for Superior Court seat
Cumberland County lawyer Vic Stabile and Philadelphia Municipal Judge Joe Waters won the endorsements of the Republican and Democratic parties, respectively, for Superior Court on Saturday.
Waters, 59, beat Allegheny County Airport Authority Solicitor Mike Wojcik 199 to 62 at the Democrats' annual meeting in Hershey.
Stabile, 55, beat Bethel Park lawyer Rob Wyda for the GOP nod at the party's annual winter meeting in Harrisburg. Republicans also re-elected Rob Gleason as chairman and Joyce Haas as vice chairwoman.
The Superior Court seat is the only statewide office on the ballot this year. The primary is May 21.
Mike Wereschagin is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7900 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.