Pennsylvania American Water to begin spring water line upgrade in Butler, Allegheny counties
Pennsylvania American Water will replace more than three miles of aging water mains in Butler County.
The work is expected to begin in the spring. Some of the lines scheduled for replacement date to the early 1900s, according to Jake Gentile, Pennsylvania American Water's operations superintendent.
“The new pipe will provide improved reliability, as well as enhanced water pressure and fire protection for our customers,” Gentile said. The work will last for several months and cost about $3.6 million.
A distribution system improvement charge tacked onto customers' bills will pay for the work, according to spokesman Gary Lobaugh. The average residential customer whose annual water bill is $618 will pay an additional $22 a year for the improvements.
The company has been upgrading its infrastructure throughout the region, including spending $10 million to rehabilitate its Lake Oneida Dam and Reservoir in Oakland, Butler County, and spending more than $100 million to upgrade water treatment facilities in the Pittsburgh area.
The company also will replace more than five miles of water mains in Pittsburgh and surrounding communities at a cost of about $7 million.
During the work, the company said, customers may experience temporary interruptions in their service, low water pressure or discolored water. Affected customers are being notified by mail.
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Grandmother of boy dropped at Uniontown Hospital says he’s in ICU
- Pittsburgh’s tech startup activity rates last of 40 metro areas in report
- Locke pitches 8 scoreless innings as Pirates edge Indians
- Pine-Richland graduate helps spark U.S. to Women’s World Club final
- McCutchen, Pirates hitters increasingly in crosshairs
- Innovation enhances Philadelphia’s history as Democrats convene, Pope Francis visits
- Pirates trust eye test when voting for all-stars
- Starting 9: Pirates missing out on young bat
- No boat races, so regatta-goers find something else to do
- Arizona prison says 700 inmates again ‘refusing to comply’
- Supreme Court ruling on threats may affect Connecticut case