Etna woman dies in crash; police await test results on other driver
State police are awaiting test results before deciding whether to charge a driver involved in a fatal crash on Route 28 late Saturday, investigators said.
Trooper Thomas Snyder reported Jared P. Schillinger, 28, of Cheswick showed “signs of intoxication” after the 11:15 p.m. crash in Sharpsburg that killed Rikki A. Fleming, 18, of Etna.
Fleming was driving north in the left lane of Route 28 about a half-mile north of the Etna interchange, police said, when Schillinger came up behind her and failed to slow his Volkswagen GTI hatchback before it hit her Hyundai Tiburon.
Fleming's car was forced up an embankment in the median and overturned. Although police said Fleming was wearing a seat belt, she was thrown from the car. She did not have any passengers.
The Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office pronounced her dead at the scene about 15 minutes later. An autopsy on Sunday revealed a laceration to Fleming's heart and blunt-force trauma to her body and limbs caused her death, which the medical examiner's office ruled an accident.
Police said Schillinger was not injured, nor were his two passengers, Andrew R. Callender, 29, of Tarentum and Cody A. Roberts, 27, of Pittsburgh. All three were wearing seat belts.
Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She canbe reached at 724-226-4680 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.