County council votes to allow gas drilling at airport
Allegheny County Council will allow gas drilling at Pittsburgh International Airport, voting Tuesday night to approve a lease with Consol Energy that county officials have said might be worth $500 million.
Council voted 9-4 with one abstention. Drilling would start no earlier than late 2014 in six to eight locations around the perimeter of the Findlay airport, officials have said.
Federal rules require the money to stay at the airport, where officials want to use it to upgrade airport-controlled land for more commerce and office developments.
“The deal is not without risk. We obviously will get on the property as soon as this gets official” to do seismic testing, said Tommy Johnson, Consol's vice president of government and public relations, after the vote. “We may find that ($500 million) number is higher based on production.”
Cecil-based Consol will pay the county $50 million in about a month, when officials sign the contracts. That money includes $5,000 per acre in an up-front bonus and a $3.7 million surface rent payment for well pads. The rest of the money would come from royalty payments of 18 percent that start when gas production does.
“I think it's extremely momentous. It shows there is support for this industry,” said Robert J. Macey, D-West Mifflin, who shepherded the bill through committee.
About a dozen protesters heckled or cheered speakers during nearly two hours of comments and debate leading to the vote. Some held signs decrying environmental threats from drilling and the relationships between the industry and County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, who pleaded for industry leaders to donate to his 2011 election campaign.
Fitzgerald plans to sign the bill as soon as council gets it to him, one of his staffers said.
“While the revenues from this deal will go directly to the airport, Allegheny County taxpayers benefit, too,” Fitzgerald said in a statement touting the deal's potential to lower airline costs and boost business in the neighboring suburbs. “With this type of investment, there will be even more growth of good, family-sustaining jobs in our community.”
Anti-drilling activist Mel Packer criticized county leaders for their estimates of the deal's payout to the airport. Fitzgerald said last month that the deal would net $4 million to $6 million a year in royalties from gas production. Two weeks later, he said more thorough estimates showed likely income of more than $22 million a year for 20 years.
“All you have to do is look at any business page to see that $500 million figure is an absolute lie,” Packer said, noting how a glut of gas has led to low commodity prices, an industry slowdown and long-term questions about when the price of gas will rise again.
Democrats James Burn Jr. of Millvale, Barbara Daly Danko of Regent Square, Amanda Green Hawkins of Stanton Heights and William Russell Robinson of the Hill District voted against the lease, citing concerns about environmental risks, who would get the jobs and whether the county got the best deal possible.
Republican Heather S. Heidelbaugh of Mt. Lebanon abstained to avoid a conflict of interest because her law firm does work for Consol, she said.
Timothy Puko is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Locke’s difficulties continue thanks to old friends
- Police: Body found beneath Tarentum Bridge is jumper
- City of Asylum app shines light on North Side
- Pirates notebook: Cole scratched from rehab start at Indianapolis
- Steelers extend Suisham’s contract through 2018
- Pitt suspends cornerback Howard
- West Mifflin Legion team exits state tournament
- House OKs bill to address border crisis
- NFL notebook: Goodell defends Rice’s 2-game suspension
- Police target 17 in Mon Valley drug investigation
- Churches putting faith in social media