Police believe Cranberry remains are those of Beaver County man missing since July
Cranberry police believe skeletal remains found along Dutilh Road are those of a Beaver County man reported missing in July.
Sgt. Chuck Mascellino said on Monday that a wallet found among the remains contained identification for a man believed to be in his 40s. A relative of that man called police during the weekend to ask about the remains, he said.
“We have tentative identification,” Mascellino said. “We're still waiting for confirmation that that's who the person is.”
A man walking from UPMC Passavant Cranberry to a nearby business on Saturday found the skeletal remains and some clothing about 2:30 p.m. on hospital property near Dutilh United Methodist Church, Mascellino said. The remains were not buried.
Mascellino said police don't believe the remains are those of a hospital patient.
Based on the condition of the remains, investigators believe they were outside for some time, Mascellino said.
A team led by Dennis Dirkmaat, a forensic anthropologist from Mercyhurst University in Erie, processed the remains on Saturday night to determine an identity and the cause of death.
Margaret Harding is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8519 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.