ShareThis Page

Witness in Smyrnes sentencing hearing says he raped her at age 10

Rich Cholodofsky
| Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2013, 2:36 p.m.

A former classmate of Ricky Smyrnes told a Westmoreland County jury Tuesday that he raped her and threatened her life during a childhood play date at his North Huntingdon home when she was just 10 years old.

“He took off my clothes. He took off his swim trunks and he forced himself on top of me,” the woman, who is now 26, said in the first day of testimony in the penalty phase of Smyrnes' capital murder trial.

The jury, which last week convicted Smyrnes, 26, of first-degree murder, is now hearing evidence as to whether he should be condemned to death by lethal injection or sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Smyrnes was found guilty for the February 2010 torture murder of Jennifer Daugherty, a 30-year-old mentally challenged woman from Mt. Pleasant.

District Attorney John Peck said Smyrnes was the catalyst who led a group of six roommates to turn on Daugherty in their Greensburg apartment. Prosecutors said Daugherty was kidnapped and held against her will as they beat her, tied her up and tortured her. Her body, bound in Christmas lights and garland, was put in a garbage can and left in a parking lot on North Main Street in Greensburg.

Peck told jurors that Smyrnes should be put to death because he helped to torture Daugherty and because he has an extensive criminal history marked by violence.

That includes two convictions in juvenile court when he was just 11.

Jurors heard evidence from his former classmate at Stewartsville Elementary School in North Huntingdon, who said she was sexually assaulted by Smyrnes in June 1997. The woman looked down, repeatedly rubbed her arms and sobbed as she described how Smyrnes forced himself upon her and then held a needle to her neck and threatened her.

“He said he was going to ... kill me,” she testified.

According to court records, Smyrnes was adjudicated delinquent for one felony count of aggravated indecent assault.

The prosecution said that in 1997, Smyrnes was convicted of burglarizing his neighbors' home and stealing knives, ammunition and guitars.

“There are certainly some killings worse than other killings. There are killers worse than other killers. Let me tell you now, Ricky Smyrnes is one of those killers,” Peck told jurors. “Life in prison is woefully inadequate.”

Defense attorney Terrance Faye in a 45-minute opening statement outlined Smyrnes' deplorable childhood. He was sold into sex by his biological mother and molested by his biological father, Faye said.

He was adopted in 1994 by the Smyrnes family but has never been able to overcome the scars inflicted in early childhood, Faye said.

Smyrnes has been diagnosed with depression, a psychotic disorder and attention deficit disorder. Faye said Smyrnes suffers from hallucinations and hears voices. According to Faye, Smyrnes has multiple personality disorder and has as many as seven personalities with names such as “Baby,” “Lashonda,” “Higher Power” and “Big Guy.”

“Ricky's childhood was total chaos,” Faye said.

Faye asked jurors to consider Smyrnes' intellectual deficiencies as a means to spare his life. Smyrnes' intelligence tests average in the “mild mentally retarded” range, Faye said.

“Mentally retarded people are not killed in the (United States) for their crimes,” Faye said.

Smyrnes was one of seven children who were mistreated by his biological mother and eventually put into foster care. He was adopted after the Smyrnes family saw him featured on a local television news program.

Smyrnes suffered from sexual dysfunction, Faye said. He dressed his stuffed animals in women's clothing, then dated and had sex with them, Faye said.

“An appropriate sentence is life in prison without the possibility of parole,” Faye said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.