Pennsylvania again extends lottery bid with British firm Camelot
HARRISBURG — The state Department of Revenue reached agreement with a British-based firm to extend the company's lottery privatization bid until mid-March.
The extension announced Friday came a week after Attorney General Kathleen Kane, a Democrat, ruled the contract was illegal. Republican Gov. Tom Corbett continues to push for a way to execute the contract with Camelot Global Services PA.
The extension “allows both parties to continue considering strategic next steps in an effort to secure and maximize long-term lottery funding for seniors programs,” said revenue spokeswoman Elizabeth Brassell. Camelot guaranteed Pennsylvania $34 billion in profits over 20 years to manage the lottery, which would remain a state asset. The state and Camelot have extended the bid several times.
The attorney general by law reviews all state contracts for “form and legality.” One of the legal hurdles is whether allowing monitor-based games such as keno is an expansion gambling that requires legislative approval.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.