Share This Page

Man killed in Washington County auto accident

| Saturday, Feb. 23, 2013, 3:00 p.m.

A volunteer firefighter responding to a report of a fatal accident in Hanover discovered that the victim was his brother-in-law.

Frederick Speers III, 53, of Burgettstown lost control of his Jeep while driving north on Purdy Road in Hanover when he drove off the road Friday night, according to Washington County Coroner Timothy Warco. Speers' vehicle hit a tree, rolled down an embankment and into a creek.

Victor Wright, a member of the Hanover Volunteer Fire Department, was among those firefighters responding to the crash.

Wright identified Speers, who is his brother-in-law.

“When we heard the location, I had a gut feeling it could be him,” said Wright, who is 65 and has been a volunteer firefighter for 18 years.

“I've seen too much of this over the years. But you never want to come onto one of your relatives,” he said.

Speers worked for Wright's well and pool service company. Speers was the father of five children.

Firefighters and police had to break into the car, where they found Speers dead.

The cause and manner of death are pending autopsy results.

The crash was discovered by a passing FedEx truck about 9 a.m., Warco said.

Speers was alone in the vehicle.

State police are investigating.

Rick Wills is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at rwills@tribweb.com

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.