Ferlo says he hasn't decided on run for Pittsburgh mayor
State Sen. Jim Ferlo said on Friday he might join the Pittsburgh mayoral race.
“Whether I am in the mix or not I have not determined yet,” the Highland Park Democrat said hours after Mayor Luke Ravenstahl said he will not seek re-election.
Ferlo, a senator for 10 years and ally of the mayor, said others might consider running. “We will have to wait to see what happens over the weekend. ... I am sure there will be a beehive of activity.”
Controller Michael Lamb and Councilman Bill Peduto are running for the Democratic nomination in the May 21 primary, although Peduto is not seeking the party endorsement. Candidates' nominating petitions are due March 12.
Ferlo, 60, said the party should not endorse anyone.
“I don't think it is fair to have a Democratic endorsement at this point, and it would not be a legitimate process,” he said.
Ferlo served 14 years on City Council, including two terms as council president. The most recent proposal for a new legislative map merges his district with a suburban Republican area.
He said he is not emotionally inclined to support Peduto or Lamb: “It's not like I have some ax to grind with either of them. I just don't support them.”
About fellow Democrat Jack Wagner of Beechview, Ferlo noted the former state senator and auditor general often says he will run.
“So far he hasn't,” Ferlo said. Wagner told the Tribune-Review this week he is considering running as an independent in the fall.
Salena Zito is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Grandmother of boy dropped at Uniontown Hospital says he’s in ICU
- Pittsburgh’s tech startup activity rates last of 40 metro areas in report
- Locke pitches 8 scoreless innings as Pirates edge Indians
- Pine-Richland graduate helps spark U.S. to Women’s World Club final
- McCutchen, Pirates hitters increasingly in crosshairs
- Pirates trust eye test when voting for all-stars
- Innovation enhances Philadelphia’s history as Democrats convene, Pope Francis visits
- Starting 9: Pirates missing out on young bat
- No boat races, so regatta-goers find something else to do
- Arizona prison says 700 inmates again ‘refusing to comply’
- Supreme Court ruling on threats may affect Connecticut case