Jury awards $5.75 million to creditors of former elder care home
An eight-person federal jury on Friday awarded the unsecured creditors of the former Lemington Home for the Aged $5.75 million in damages.
In a two-week trial before U.S. District Judge Arthur Schwab, attorneys for the creditors presented evidence that former administrator Mel Causey, former chief financial officer James Shealey and the board drove the home into bankruptcy.
Founded in 1883, the nonprofit that was also known as the Lemington Center was the oldest African-American-sponsored nursing home until it closed in July 2005.
The jury, which began deliberations on Wednesday at noon, awarded the creditors $2.25 million in compensatory damages against Causey, Shealey and 13 of the 15 directors and awarded punitive damages of $1 million against Shealey, $750,000 against Causey and $350,000 each against five of the 15 directors.
Lawyers for the creditors, the officers and the board declined comment after the verdict was announced.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Opposing defenses find success against Steelers by eschewing blitz
- Penguins forward Downie becoming a hit with teammates
- Steelers looking for Spence to step up game at inside linebacker
- Western Pennsylvania residents chill about forecasters’ spat
- Shale oil, gas finds put Mon Valley on path to renaissance, leaders say
- Pittsburgh wins Gawker.com ugliest accent tourney n’at
- Steelers’ Brown made good after leaving PSU in wake of sanctions
- Legal titans prepared to tussle in Ferrante cyanide homicide trial
- Snapshot in time: Comparing Cowher, Tomlin drafts
- Large-scale batteries are integral in shift to renewable energy
- Crash closes road in Dunbar